Advertisement

nuclear weapons

PRIMER PLANO

El presidente de los Estados Unidos, Donald J. Trump, habla a los medios antes de partir a Houston, Texas, para un mitin en apoyo al senador Ted Cruz hoy, lunes 22 de octubre de 2018, desde la Casa Blanca, en Washington, DC. EFE/Jim Lo Scalzo

Trump anunció durante el fin de semana que Estados Unidos se retirará del histórico Tratado de Fuerzas Nucleares de Alcance Intermedio con Rusia, argumentando que el país “ha violado el acuerdo”.

[OP-ED]: The Art of the Bluff

 08/15/2017 - 15:13
Trump has made clear that the United States would respond to North Korean nuclear threats with a massive military strike, possibly involving nuclear weapons. EFE

How did we get here? Why does it appear that we’re on the brink of a war in Asia, one that could involve nuclear weapons? North Korea has had nuclear-weapons capacity for at least 10 years now. Have its recent advances been so dramatic and significant to force the United States to wage a preventive war? No. The crisis we now find ourselves in has been exaggerated and mishandled by the Trump administration to a degree that is deeply worrying and dangerous.

[OP-ED]: On North Korea, hope is not a strategy

 07/11/2017 - 15:46
Kim Jong Un is a young man but has been highly effective at preserving his authority. He has secured the support of the military and sidelined or killed anyone who threatened his grip on power -- including his uncle and, allegedly, his half-brother. EFE

In Washington, there is a conventional wisdom on North Korea that spans both parties and much of elite opinion. It goes roughly like this: North Korea is the world’s most bizarre country, run by a crackpot dictator with a strange haircut. He is unpredictable and irrational and cannot be negotiated with. Eventually this weird and cruel regime will collapse. Meanwhile, the only solution is more and more pressure. But what if the conventional wisdom is wrong?